Since dogs aren't really omnivores, one of the main advantages is in...er...waste (specifically, lack thereof). My dogs typically produce less on a more meat oriented diet. Furthermore, it doesn't stink as much or as long and quickly turns into a white powdery substance which is easier to see and therefore easier to police in their enclosure. For a while, when we could afford it, we had our animals on a semi-raw diet (they got uncooked chicken quarters twice a week and ground beef or lamb and rice with bone meal supplements the rest of the week per our vet).GlassWalker wrote:I was looking to ease our puppy into a good food. I guess what I'm wondering, what are the life benefits of a super healthy food?
Your best bet would be to ask your vet for a list of crude protein percentages and absolute nutrients and then be prepared to spend a long time comparing labels. When we found a dry food that met those requirements, it turned out NOT to be one of the more expensive or typically vet recommended brands. It was our local supermarket brand. While it does still have grains and vegetables in it, they're way down on the ingredient list and the ingredients are recognizable as food instead of mechanically separated parts or animal byproducts.
I can't say whether the dogs are healthier or not but their coats look better, they eat less, and they don't barf as much as they did on the other stuff.