Men Hitting Women And Equal Rights?

This forum is for serious discussions of any kind.

Moderator: Hall of Speakers Moderators

Should Men Be Able To Hit Back?

Yes!
8
47%
No!
1
6%
It really depends
8
47%
 
Total votes : 17

Men Hitting Women And Equal Rights?

Postby Rinnyracecar » August 15th, 2017, 7:48:40 pm

I like to believe that when a woman hits a man, a man can hit back (not over the to, mind you). Feminists want equality? Well, fighting back in self defense is equal, even though people immediately go hold back the man and rush to the woman like she is make of glass. This greatly upsets me because (i'm NOT saying all do this, very few do, actually)some women cry and play victim after a brutal attack ON THEIR PART!

I understand that (based on stats only) women are often sexually assaulted and domestically abused by men, but please keep in mind that women can assault women, men, anyone else, and the other way around.
Also, how often have you seen two people fight (1 man, 1 woman) and the woman attacks first, the guy hits back, then the girl ACTUALLY stays down?

If you would like to contribute, please fill out the form and RESPECT ALL OPINIONS. THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO GET ANGRY AND BE CHILDISH. WHILE I'M AT IT, DON'T INSULT OTHERS OR SAY SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF "DISCUSSION" SOMEONE COULD BE OFFENDED BY

Code: Select all
[b]If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:[/b]

[b]Why so/why not?:[/b]

[b]Other opinions/facts:[/b]


Please remember to stay appropriate for Magistream and be respectful. We are not here to change others opinions, just help contribute our own. You may challenge an opinion but NEVER say anything along the lines of "your wrong, you can't think that". When you challenge someone, do not argue, but you may point out thing you disagree with. If I must, I will try to stop it, maybe even a mod will get involved if needed. Thanks everyone ^_^

If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:
Yes, but only as self defense, as men are usually larger than woman and can
commonly do more damage. Two wrongs don't make a right, of course, but I think that when it's a situation like that, a man should be able to press charges and a girl can't just cry about it while other girls attack him for "hitting a woman" while men try to hold him back. A lot of women don't actually back off after the incident so sometimes holding them down to prevent any further attacks in nessicary, but she may scream "get your hands off me" or something. Completely unfair to all those men in these situations and to all those snakey women, get a life, yo
Why so/why not?:
Because those feminests want equality? Give it to them in a self-defense hit! :t-xD:

Other opinions/facts: I am VERY passionate about this topic and any point of view and/or opinions will be appreciatedand respected.

DO NOT BLACK/GOLD LIST ANY HERE BASED ON THEIR OPINIONS. THAT IS WRONG AND UNACCEPTABLE. YOU MAY BLACKLIST IF THERE WERE PREVIOUS ISSUES, AS WELL AS THEM INSULTING YOU. DO NOT INSULT BACK, SIMPLY REPORT IT TO ME AND I WILL DO WHAT I NEED.
Last edited by Rinnyracecar on September 8th, 2017, 4:40:45 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Image
I share this shop with Unidove! It's been recently updated <3


Click before it's too late!
ImageImageImageImageImage


See something you like in my keep? Feel free to make an offer!
User avatar
Rinnyracecar
CreaturesTrade
MagiStream Donor
Member of The Dark Brotherhood
Posts: 1155
Joined: March 16th, 2017, 8:18:31 pm
Location: Over the garden wall
Gender: Kraken

Re: Fighting Back?

Postby chihirolorc » August 17th, 2017, 5:22:37 am

If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:

It depends. There is no clear black or white answer on this one. But for the majority of the cases I would say no.

Why so/why not?: I watched the video of the subway slapper that you mentioned. In that case I do not think the hitting back was warranted. Why? Because as the video showed, the man quickly flew into a rage, hit her back way harder, and tried hitting multiple times. That in my opinion is 100% unacceptable. That wasn't about self defense. That was about not being able to control your anger and wanting to hurt the person back.

Other opinions/facts:

It is statistically proven that men are more likely to beat a woman to death than the other way around. I specifically chose beating to death as the measure because it shows the absolute severity of the beating and a number that cannot be challenged. For other cases of abuse, self reporting can alter the actual numbers. The number of dead bodies is hard cold evidence. In Canada, in the year 2011, 59 women were beaten to death by their husband whereas 7 men were beaten and killed. That's a 90 to 10% ratio. 59 may seem as a small number but bare in mind this is the people who were outright killed. Not those who were severely beaten. (http://www.women.gov.on.ca/owd/english/ ... #footnote8)

So why am I posting this? It's to illustrate that when men use force it is likely WAY more dangerous than when a woman does. Men are way more likely to fly into a rage and beat another person to death. It may at first seem as though hitting back is justified, provided that the woman hit first, but in most of the cases the violence thrown back is WAY DISPROPORTIONATE . Saying that a man should be able to beat a woman if he was hit first is like saying that I now get to mow down your whole lawn just because you broke one flower in my garden. Also, I still don't think I should get to break a flower too. An eye for an eye logic is about vengeance not justice. I think it's sad that you think people think of men as punching bags and women as china cups, when women are statistically a lot more likely to become punching bags. They have historically been the largest victims of abuse, and still are.

Conclusion:
Am I saying that when a woman hits a man she should go free? Absolutely not. But that's what assault charges are for. The man in the video had a choice. He had a choice to walk way and report her. But he didn't. He self absolved himself of guilt and beat her back way harder. That is not okay and should not be okay. The establishment of a criminal justice system is one of the greatest achievements of a civilized society. Taking matters into your own hands and hitting back completely disregards justice.

So when is it justified? When the man reasonably fears for his safety and does not have an option to walk away. In other words, a genuine case of self defense.
User avatar
chihirolorc
CreaturesTrade
MagiStream Donor
 
Posts: 248
Joined: July 18th, 2009, 9:38:31 am
Location: Canada Toronto
Gender: Kraken

Re: Fighting Back?

Postby Rinnyracecar » August 17th, 2017, 4:48:58 pm

chihirolorc wrote:If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:

It depends. There is no clear black or white answer on this one. But for the majority of the cases I would say no.

Why so/why not?: I watched the video of the subway slapper that you mentioned. In that case I do not think the hitting back was warranted. Why? Because as the video showed, the man quickly flew into a rage, hit her back way harder, and tried hitting multiple times. That in my opinion is 100% unacceptable. That wasn't about self defense. That was about not being able to control your anger and wanting to hurt the person back.

Other opinions/facts:

It is statistically proven that men are more likely to beat a woman to death than the other way around. I specifically chose beating to death as the measure because it shows the absolute severity of the beating and a number that cannot be challenged. For other cases of abuse, self reporting can alter the actual numbers. The number of dead bodies is hard cold evidence. In Canada, in the year 2011, 59 women were beaten to death by their husband whereas 7 men were beaten and killed. That's a 90 to 10% ratio. 59 may seem as a small number but bare in mind this is the people who were outright killed. Not those who were severely beaten. (http://www.women.gov.on.ca/owd/english/ ... #footnote8)

So why am I posting this? It's to illustrate that when men use force it is likely WAY more dangerous than when a woman does. Men are way more likely to fly into a rage and beat another person to death. It may at first seem as though hitting back is justified, provided that the woman hit first, but in most of the cases the violence thrown back is WAY DISPROPORTIONATE . Saying that a man should be able to beat a woman if he was hit first is like saying that I now get to mow down your whole lawn just because you broke one flower in my garden. Also, I still don't think I should get to break a flower too. An eye for an eye logic is about vengeance not justice. I think it's sad that you think people think of men as punching bags and women as china cups, when women are statistically a lot more likely to become punching bags. They have historically been the largest victims of abuse, and still are.

Conclusion:
Am I saying that when a woman hits a man she should go free? Absolutely not. But that's what assault charges are for. The man in the video had a choice. He had a choice to walk way and report her. But he didn't. He self absolved himself of guilt and beat her back way harder. That is not okay and should not be okay. The establishment of a criminal justice system is one of the greatest achievements of a civilized society. Taking matters into your own hands and hitting back completely disregards justice.

So when is it justified? When the man reasonably fears for his safety and does not have an option to walk away. In other words, a genuine case of self defense.

Very good point! I agree when you say that a man should not hit extremely hard when a woman hits lighter than what he hit (if that makes sense). Also, to clarify, I don't think the "punching-bag china cup" thing based on stats, it's how people (around my area from what iv'e seen)tend to say things like "don't ever hit a woman" and the woman is beating up a guy,but they get all crazy when he hits back (probably for self defense). I'm also not saying that every guy is a punching-bag, but many are expected to be like that, the same with women. a few women I see are acting brutal then playing victim, many don't, but some do. I personally am quite strong and would never hit a guy, but I see people who thinks ok or even the right thing to do to "test his manlyness' by hitting him.

Thank you for contributing
Image
I share this shop with Unidove! It's been recently updated <3


Click before it's too late!
ImageImageImageImageImage


See something you like in my keep? Feel free to make an offer!
User avatar
Rinnyracecar
CreaturesTrade
MagiStream Donor
Member of The Dark Brotherhood
Posts: 1155
Joined: March 16th, 2017, 8:18:31 pm
Location: Over the garden wall
Gender: Kraken

Re: Men Hitting Women

Postby crimsonkitsune » August 22nd, 2017, 1:25:12 am

If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:
Personally, I don't think anyone should be hitting anyone. Keep your dang hands to yourself in the first place, gosh darn it! But if a man's life is genuinely threatened and the hits keep coming in earnest, by all means use self-defense! But just be smart about it and use proper fight techniques to fend them off

Why so/why not?:
To expand upon my view, let me just state for the record that I am a total pacifist at heart-- always have been. Fighting is pointless. Violence is stupid and only serves to beget more violence. An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind, you know.
That being said, I'm also a practicioner of Muay Thai, so I am technically a fan of fighting, to some extent. It's an amazing workout, and makes for an exhilarating sport.
Because of my time in martial arts, I now endorse the use of self-defense (before that I wasn't on board with it at all), and for any gender, but only when the situation truly calls for it. And only when using the right kind of martial arts to defend yourself.

Some styles are slightly better for self-defense. Whether my style is effective or not is debatable: Muay Thai is a great style inside of the ring; it's definitely earned its place in professional fighting. Outside of the ring, my art form is especially well-suited for fending off a group of people, but it's really only effective until the fight goes to the ground (which it almost always does), since my primary weapons are my shins and my knees. It's a good form of self-defense sometimes -- you can fight from a distance and hardly anyone expects a strong kick instead of a punch -- but there are other martial arts better suited for incapacitating people quickly and more efficiently.

I firmly believe that self-defense should only be enacted through the use of martial arts, since they're all about incapacitating your attacker. You're not looking to beat someone to a pulp, you're working to stop the attacker, force them to submit. You are disciplined, and you have restraint. That's what I like about martial arts. There's a whole thought process behind it.

What I'm trying to say through all of this is that I think men (also women, but especially men since that's what the topic is about) should learn martial arts not only for self-defense tactics, but also for the control and discipline it brings. To make sure they don't go too far when they absolutely need to defend themselves--when it's a life or death situation against a woman. There are some crazy broads out there.
And hey, if nothing else, it's a great way to let off some steam, redirect that energy into something useful, and get your daily exercise in through sparring!

Other opinions/facts:
Whoops, I forgot about this section. I put the essence of all of my opinions in the middle section. Oh well, no going back now.

Well, I could reiterate that violence is stupid but inevitable, and is, as much as some people might argue, never truly the answer, but when confronted with inescapable, unrelenting violence--and from anyone of any gender--it temporarily becomes the only option to counteract it. Like fighting fire with fire, albeit a disciplined,well-controlled fire.
If a man hits a woman back, it should be only enough to stop her, and if the ordeal turns into a full-blown life-or-death situation, martial arts becomes the only acceptable method of self-defense. Self defense is not an excuse to beat the snot out of a woman, so only true methods of incapacitation should be used.

Might I also add that if you don't really know martial arts, and the situation is safe enough, then don't even bother hitting the woman back--use the good ol' justice system and slap a nice assault charge on them! See how they like that! They have no right to inflict physical harm on you-- nobody does.
~+*~+*~+*~+*~+* ~+*+*+~ *+~*+~*+~*+~*+~
I smile because I have no idea what's going on~

All of my avatars are made by me! On MS Paint! Using only a mouse!
User avatar
crimsonkitsune
CreaturesTrade
Member of The Herbalist's Guild
Posts: 246
Joined: August 14th, 2009, 7:15:44 pm
Location: Hiding in the refrigerator
Gender: Female

Re: Men Hitting Women

Postby IzzieDragon » August 22nd, 2017, 2:51:35 pm

If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:
As a kid, I was actually infuriated by boys when they said "I would hit you but you're a girl". Listen kid, you shouldn't be hitting anyone. Period.
Male lives and female lives are no more important. The only difference between us is our genitals.
Why so/why not?:If you are struck I believe you have a right to strike back regardless of gender. It's self defense. At the same time, two wrongs do not make a right.
If we could just crop out violence all together maybe the world would be a better place. But I'm not sure if we can do that.
Other opinions/facts: If anyone in this thread or reading this thread is in what they may think is an abusive relationship please seek help. Even if you do not have the strength to reach out to authorities, someone else might.
While I've never been in an abusive relationship, I've seen what it's like. You deserve better. <3
Image

♥♥♥The Feather Drake guardian says: "Thank you for the clicks!"♥♥♥
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
IzzieDragon
CreaturesTrade
 
Posts: 31
Joined: October 30th, 2011, 4:07:53 pm
Location: The Magical Land of Ohio
Gender: Female

Re: Men Hitting Women

Postby NuclearGal » August 22nd, 2017, 6:50:38 pm

If a woman hits a man, should he be allowed to hit back?:
If she starts things, than yes, I think he should be allowed to hit back. Sometimes he must restrain her or self defense, but what does she expect?
Why so/why not?:
Because it's true gender equality (if the fight/hits are fair)
Other opinions/facts:
Sometimes, men go crazy and beat up a woman way worse than she did to him, which is not cool, but if she screams for help the minute he fights back, than she needs to take a long walk off a short pier.
Thank you so much to Isabella12321 for this beautiful piece of work that is myprofile picture. Truly spectacular 10/10
User avatar
NuclearGal
CreaturesTrade
 
Posts: 108
Joined: April 23rd, 2017, 11:44:12 pm
Location: Falling into a wormhole... again
Gender: Kraken

Re: Men Hitting Women And Equal Rights?

Postby Exxthus » January 12th, 2018, 10:55:49 pm

(My response style is tricky to format into worksheet-question format without breaking flow, forgive me.)

Rather than saying whether or not hitting is okay or not, I'll say that everyone should have a right to defend themselves if legitimately attacked, regardless of who/what they may be. There will always be crazy people out there, and assault is against the law for a reason. I'll also not say that violence shouldn't ever occur. This is dangerous idealism and ignores that societies are formed around it; in order to enforce that law, the threat of violence against the law-breaker must also exist. I may be going too broad here though.
Signature Daycare

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Exxthus
CreaturesTrade
MagiStream Donor
Member of The Dark Brotherhood
Posts: 127
Joined: July 7th, 2013, 10:11:56 pm
Location: Silva Forest, in the western foothills of Alasre.


Return to Hall of Speakers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests